A Pritchard

As someone who grew up with fnaf and has followed all the lore behind it, I was very disappointed with the film. For a franchise based on jumpscares there were only 2 in the film and 1 was just ridiculous if you can call it a jumpscare. It feels like the creators tried catering to a younger audience which was a very bad choice, they gave it an age 12 rating minimising any horror aspect. They should have catered to the audience that grew up with it and appreciated it for what it was, the younger generation won't appreciate the franchise for what it is. Scott (the creater of fnaf) even said he wanted it to be gorey and full of horror, so what happened to his vision? When one of the characters get stabbed there is no blood at all because of this silly age rating. I also don't think they shouldve changed too much of the story, there are still so many unanswered questions in fnaf, and making Mike no relation to William I feel was a bad choice. I was hoping the second film will be better but considering the age rating is the same as the first I don't have my hopes up and won't be watching in cinema.

I feel robbed, "based on a true story" sure buddy. This film was awful, what could've been a good film turned out to be a "horror" film based around witchcraft and ended being a slapstick comedy. Also, the back and forth with all the different stories hasn't been popular since the early 2000s with good reason. And the silly little naruto runs throughout were ridiculous, just bad directing. I will give credit where credit is due, the acting from all the cast, apart from the woman that played witch, was good. The story started off strong but just turned silly. Not to mention all of the random plot holes, like; why a clown? How come everyone saw the clown? What was with the random 50ft rifle in the sky? No one heard any of the kids leaving their house? Not one camera picked up where the kids were running? What was the point of the police? What was the point of the affair? What was the point of the drugy? What was the point of giving her an alcohol problem? Waste of time and money. Don't bother.

Terrible, they put the furious 5 in a trailer because they knew it wouldn't sell without them and they weren't even in it. They destroyed Tai Lungs character, he had some funny bit for the 5 mins he was in it but at the end they wrecked who he is as a character. The "twist" was obvious from the start of the film. The trailer made it seem like it was going to be this amazing cinematic experience with all the different villains from the past and there was NOTHING. I wouldn't recommend this to anyone, not even my worst enemy