Watched it in V.S.MAHAL, Namavaram in D3 seat at 2.30pm show on 22.6.25, with my family. I'm a common audience, not a regular reviewer. So don't expect pros, cons, music, cinematography etc. You can read about them from other reviewers. I'm only talking about the PLOT as I understood it.
Kind of liked it the way it was narrated but kind of worried about the kind of climax Sekhar sir has designed.
Let me tell you my take on it. Like all others telling about 2 different worlds with stark contrast and all.
This is about
1. a good guy, who is innocent and thinks positively - Dhanush
2. a good guy who was betrayed by the system, turned bad to save his family, finally returns to his good side after realising what he has lost after turning bad - Nag sir
3. a bad guy, who is evil in his thoughts and deeds, who needs OWN everything at ANY COST - Jim Sarbh.
Why would common audience bother to view a fight between a billionaire and a beggar? Where could he identify himself? Here comes the non spoiler plot.
The plot is simple. All the three of them were thrown at an opportunity to own fortune.
Why did they grab that opportunity, how did they grab that opportunity - this was narrated very intricatly in their characters. We all are represented by these characters the good, the bad and the ugly.
We should appreciate Sekhar sir for dramatising this thought in an engaging and thought inducing way.
Finally, the worrisome thing about the Sekhar sir's climax. Accidental death of the villain in the hands of the hero. My problem here is about being human. It takes lot of hard haeartedness to kill someone. It is not easy or ordinary as shown in the movies. When someone has death on his hands, naturally the doors to animal nature have opened in him, whether knowingly or unknowingly. It could start taking him to darker side of man. This is absolutely not expected from a person like Sekhar sir. His last outing LOVE STORY too ended in an accidental death of the villain. I think Sekhar might have satisfied by saying it's ACCIDENTAL, not intentional. Still it's NOT EXPECTED from him.
How it would have ended better.
1. Though it sounded dramatic, he should have ended by showing that the villain has transformed.
2. That the politicians have turned him in because he has failed to bring in the beggar, showing that he has succumbed to his own evil deeds.
I hope his team takes time to read this out. Fingers crossed.
If you have read till here, I'm very thankful for your valuable time. Have a great life ahead.