Mahdi Mohammad Niya

In this note I try to show how proust refers to distinctions between reality and imaginations in Swan`s way: volume I of “In search of lost time” In the last sentences of volume I when the narrator describes the Bois de Boulogne he says: I should have required also that they be the same women, those whose costume interested me because at a time when I still had faith, my imagination had individualized them and had provided each of them with a legend … he continues with lamentation : they had long fled, and still I stood vainly questioning the deserted paths. Then he continues: … and helped me to understand how paradoxical it is to seek in reality for the pictures that are stored in one`s memory, which must inevitably lose the charm that comes to them from memory itself and from their not being apprehended by the senses. the reality I had known no longer existed ... more about this, I write in goodreads

I read "faceless killers" from mankell before. I prefer this one , because of the cause and reasoning is more complicated. as we know in criminal novels the process of events and the situation that cause events is more important than in the other genre. so if we have more complicated circumstances (the ones who have reasonable cause) then we have better story. in this novel however we have some mistake by the author, for example in late chapters we dont understand how kurt wallander find the tow address of "ander" the murderer. whereas before the late chapters, we usually informed a bout how the team of investigation could find the lead. and occasionally they were be disappointed. But here wallander go to the ander`s house in Ystad without any information to the readers. and when he realize she does nt there, immediately he and his team ran to the next address. this mistakes are trifle, and we can focus on the the whole image of novel. in general I think hennig mankell has great ability in describing fear space and he could create the good shape of horror and crime in this writing.