Jishnu JP

Look, If you're looking for creativity, (the kind shown by Jurassic Park's first movie in creating a good plot and including dinosaurs in it and other things that were relatively new to the cinemas), this is not the movie for you. If you are expecting some good action scenes (like the one in jurassic world, one with the indominus rex), you will be disappointed because the only gripping scene is the river raft scene(that also is predictable). Look, the horror element comes when you are not expecting something and that happens or you dont want somethong to happen and that happens. But , in here, everything is sooo predictable. for instance, in the last scene, a guy distracts a mutant disgusting large dinosaur into him for saving his friends. He must have been in the dinosaur's hands but magically he escapes somehow (how? It's not shown) and is shown swimming towards his friends who escaped through boat. You must have a basic sense of logic in cinemas or steven spielberg(director of first Jurassic park movie of 1993) could have wrote aliens took dinosaurs to earth and they went back and some foolish story like that but what did he write :- they developed dinosaurs from the DNA in labs ina park which is kind of believable and has a logic element to it! One things iam for sure, if you watch this once you wont be compelled ti watch it again (like 1993 jurassic oark) which i watched many times i lost the count.Why? because the new movie's plot was not that good. A better story of build-up must have been there.