Richard Iru

What the hell happened here? A movie is just sold to the public because of TC?? is that all it takes?

This is a complete waste of time. I can’t even give this one star. Who the hell wrote a movie that is just all over the place. Suria is losing his plot. Choose better roles or just quit acting. Poor all around. Some saving grace is some villagers who did some good acting there is no storyline there’s no follow-up on certain things mentioned the whole mumbo-jumbo about something called the goldfish was just all over the place. You have to watch the ending and then you laugh as much as I laughed poor Job in writing surely you cannot say to someone who did such a bad job. These must be only Suria’s friends of fans or family members who can praise this rubbish movie I’m sorry don’t waste your money on this. Do something valuable for the three hours of complete waste of time. I’ve never been bored watching a movie A small advice for Suria, you are a good actor, but you are bad in this. If you watch this you will know what I’m saying. Do a better role where it shows your calibre as an actor this is not it

This film proves to be a challenging watch, not because of its complexity, but due to its erratic narrative structure and excessive stylization. The storyline lacks cohesion, often jumping between subplots without a clear direction, making it difficult for the audience to stay engaged. A major point of contention is the overuse of "mass hero" introductions. While one or two such moments can heighten impact, the film indulges in six or seven similar sequences, each accompanied by deafening background music. Nearly every character’s entrance is treated like a grand event, to the point where it feels repetitive and overwhelming. The exaggerated use of slow-motion walks and upward glances set to dramatic music quickly becomes tiresome and borders on parody. Visually, it’s clear that a significant budget was allocated — from high-end equipment to international talent — but the story doesn’t hold up. What could have been a focused revenge drama revolving around a boy’s vendetta, possibly linked with the central character "Lucifer", ends up muddled in unnecessary political drama. The film’s fixation on party politics, leadership transitions, and shallow side characters dilutes any emotional core the plot might have had. Additionally, the symbolic wordplay around the letter “L” comes off as juvenile rather than clever — an odd creative choice that fails to resonate. Character development is virtually nonexistent. Even the main characters are given little emotional depth or compelling arcs. The first half feels particularly drawn out, burdened with political exposition and dialogue that adds little value to the narrative. The editing, too, is disorienting, which further complicates an already fragmented storyline. In short, this film is a classic example of style over substance. It tries to do too much and ends up delivering very little. Unless drastic changes are made, a third installment would be inadvisable. Sometimes, it’s best to take the budget and walk away. Rating: 3/10 Not recommended. Even a rewatch of Snow White would be more satisfying.

I liked Alu arjun. How can someone be honest and say this is a good movie.

Total nonsense. I don’t know what the writer or the director was thinking. All over the place. Don’t cheat audience this way have some sort of respect. If you like this movie you need to relook at yourself. I want my 3 hours back and my money back but no one can give back the suffering I went thru.