It is a bit interesting to read, since it provides some insight into how large institutes work, and how she thinks, but the author makes some false and misleading statements and handwaved it away hoping you don't look into it.
She quickly destroys her credibility in the very first chapter when she says that she was arrested without a warrant and no charges. A quick Google search can find the warrant, and the charges which were for keeping stolen property from the company she was fired from.
The worst part? She wrote a book several years earlier where she says she was framed and that the stolen property was placed at her residence. Were there no changes, or were there fake charges? Make up your mind. Well luckily, courts document things well and we can see that she lost that suit and filed for bankruptcy owing them $15Million.
It also seems like during her trial, she said she made the argument that she had to take the documents to protect the public from research corruption. If that was her story, whistleblower style, the whole way through, it might have worked, but after she just claimed that the stolen documents were being used to frame her? Very inconsistent. Apparently the court noticed. If she had a law degree, maybe she'd try writing a book about court corruption too.