When I see such a beautiful film get a 25% on rotten tomatoes. It makes me think most viewers don’t have the complexity or depth of emotional intelligence to grasp the nature of this movie. But then those who don’t like it probably think those who do were too emotionally gullible and less demanding of true depth and complexity to see it for what it really is.
I loved it. I was prepared not to. It’s a difficult undertaking, to make a movie about that book where it’s less about the action than it is about one boy’s life shattered by an event, the trauma of it wrapped up in the painting he walked out of the bombing where his mother was killed. It anchors him, this painting. It defines how he steps into most every moment for the rest of his life, until he finally liberates the painting, which frees him from that haunting moment, and liberates himself.
The lead role is played with quiet intensity. The supporting cast come and go without going too much into who they are- lacking some character development which is actually in keeping with the book. No one has any ability to really reach him and connect, except his Russian boyhood friend, who is a survivor and a misfit and with whom he shares pain and loss- it is what connect them. His other main relationship is with a girl who also shares his pain, which both connects and repels them. She moved away when he was a boy and holds the same secret unrequited spell over him as the painting, since she was there when the bomb went off, also.
I wasn’t in love with the movie- it’s just hubris to try to bring that 800 page book to a screen- but I don’t realy think anyone else could’ve done a better job. It was beautifully shot, great soundtrack, the acting was stellar. The real gold of the book happens inside the mind of the main character, which we aren’t exactly privy to in the movie. I am glad they didn’t try to have him narrate at any point to give the viewers some insight- they left the weight of this on the actor, and he delivers. I wish they had explored his relationship to Jeffrey Wright’s character, his benevolent friend and caretaker Hobie. It isn’t clear until the end how much this is about unresolved trauma because he barely seems to mourn, its all him trying to keep a lid on his emotions, trying not to cry, as a boy, and then eventually trying not to feel, as a man. He doesn’t seem to evoke his mother much except in his dreams, although she is ever present. It’s a quiet painful journey happening inside him, and it takes empathy to recognize this is the true meat of this film. I am not sure how I would have felt if I hadn’t read the book, but my boyfriend didn’t read it, and he thought he wouldn’t like it. He said he wished there was more character development, and he doesn’t understand the low ratings for a solid movie. He would have given it an 85%, which I think is about right. It’s a better movie than most of the blockbuster schlock out there.