The Kingโs Man is the prequel to the Kingsman series of films, and a concerning work of cultural subversion. Yes: the original Kingsman: The Secret Service film took aim at the English upper class, hoping to champion the next generation of U.K. citizens instead. That deliberate criticism of British culture was brought about as a carefully plotted passing of the baton. This film, however, sheds that prior narrative, building, instead, a political tirade against masculinity by โchampioningโ feminist ideological mandates. This movie not only discards the franchisesโ former voice, pace and plot, but is also full of contradictions, awful writing and propaganda instead of storytelling.
While the British people may be fully aware of the Orwellian conditions their regime is currently imposing, Americans, in their majority, remain skeptical if not incredulous to this important fact: Western media is compromised. What weโre getting thru the airwaves is no longer creative, impartial or independent. Hollywood has always struggled to prioritize artform over partisan rhetoric. Agenda has existed in film since its inception, sometimes culminating in exposition aimed directly at the audience. The Great Dictator (1940), is an example of film sacrificing coherence for politics, as Charlie Chaplin broke the fourth wall, suddenly addressing the viewer directly. Film is an art form that can inspire, seduce, heal and inform. Sadly, these very merits are what make it a perfect medium for advertising.
(The Kingโs Man film perverts the truth into a political conviction; one thatโs meant to indoctrinate the naรฏve while gaslighting the informed.)
A good script (like proper literature) has a focused plot in which all themes are connected. In The Kingโs Man the narrative is aimless, with numerous unrelated subplots; it even changes protagonists halfway thru the film! Kingโs Man often contradicts itself, presenting a pacifist who assassinates, a maid who scolds an English Lord, and male characters who constantly second guess themselves. Because the objective, here, is to deliver a feminist manifesto, the unaware moviegoer will feel frustrated and confused. The film quickly devolves into boredom or annoyance, as each scene is designed to lecture the viewer while chastising men, instead of delivering a coherent story regarding the franchise.
Whether itโs senselessly killing off characters, undermining menโs independence and determination, or championing sex positivity, each and every moment of this film is designed to indoctrinate the viewer into Woke think and behavior; itโs a vision of the world built on hatred, envy & reprisal and one which serves Neo-Marxism in its goal to undermine Western society.
As the cultural war goes mainstream, it becomes every citizenโs responsibility to recognize where their rights are being broken, where creed becomes oppressive (rather than inclusive) and where safety of the vulnerable is either violated or weaponized. Iโll make this one point clear: We MUST NOT let art and entertainment be a venue for subversion of culture and social conditioning of the innocent. When you purchase a Woke production, youโre paying for your own indoctrination.
(This film flopped at the box office, and its planned sequel is now on the rocks. I give The Kingโs Man a 1 out of 10 for its appropriation of a beloved franchise, its hateful anti-masculinity, and its Neo-Marxist underlying agenda.)