Miki Haas

Very opinionated and bias rather than fair. A dog could be a therapy dog and as long as it was big it would be a vicious killer in their opinon and it would be justified to kill the animal. The last straw was when they judged against a man whose dog had been entangled in the defendant's 4WD and while tettered by rope to the vehicle the man murdered the dog point blank with a shotgun. The defendant claimed the dog had him trapped, but obviously the man walked up to where the dog was restrained and shot the dog in the head while the dog was unable to retreat or move. The dog was obviously not a stray and the man could have called animal control. The defendant's smiling during testimony and noting how he kills squirrels alone makes me question his mental status as he appeared to find it entertaining to murder animals. However, the dog was large and therefore the judges automatically label the dog dangerous and murdering the dog was justified. I don't know which I find more offensive, the bias, prejudice judges or the demented murderer. One thing I do know is that the program is not worth viewing as their narcissistic opinions and prejudice are ridiculously bothersome.