WORLD CLASS MOVIE.
โTHUG LIFEโ justified the title.
PHENOMENAL.
10 \ 10.
โฌ๏ธ(minimalistic \ truncated version)โฌ๏ธ
โฌ๏ธ(extensive \ elaborate version)โฌ๏ธ
one show with the youth (from my gym.) but spirited old & the other with the old but spirited young (with my senior friends), made my 6 thug hours of nonstop viewing โthug lifeโ, absolutely๐ฏ๐๐ฝ enchanting & mesmerising, sans any regrets!!!
in the league of mario puzoโs godfather (1972) & mani rathnamโs nayagan (1987), thug life, is yet another WORLD CLASS MOVIE, 10 \ 10, shall be my personal & humble opinion, whatever be it, with the rest of the world?!?
if the emotions of a poor villager in เฎตเฎฒเฏเฎฏเฎชเฏเฎชเฎเฏเฎเฎฟ in india๐ฎ๐ณ, could be empathized by a rolls royce driving stinking rich in zurich in switzerland๐จ๐ญ, then itโs HUMANITY, isnโt it, vis a vis, if a movie can uniformly convey emotions across its CLASS AUDIENCES, be it any where in the world, then thatโs WORLD CINEMA๐ฆ & in my piece of mind, THUG LIFE did exactly the same!!!
the opinion of the majority, thatโd decide the box office, is probably & pretty much already out & sadly THUG LIFE hadnโt made it, i guessed, NEVER MIND, there were always A class audiences like me, thatโd carry the movie on our shoulders, forwards & into the generations to come.
if ONE learnt to view the movie, through the eyes๐ & the mind of MANI RATHNAM, then THUG LIFE is ๐ฏ100%๐ฏ justified, from the TITLE to THE DELIVERED FINAL PRODUCT, i didnโt see any problems whatsoever with it, PERIODโฆโฆ..!!!
CLASS is always CLASS, even if that crashed unto the graves, immediately on take off.
iโve seen the likes of SIVAJI GANESAN & AL PACINO in the thug, RANGARAYA SAKTHIVEL NAYAKAR.
iโm impressed, beyond any words could match.
i reiterated, ๐ง๐ฝโโก๏ธplease๐๐ฝ donโt go by the opinion of the majority, you tubers, press, etc., & lose out on YOUr own experience of viewing & judging THUG LIFE.
lemme know?!?
ps \ nb : no spoilers \ no character
portrayal descriptions, YOU
bring it up on YOUr own,
without names.